Chief Executive’s Report on Draft Plan Consultation
Volume 2 – Summary of Submissions Received
• Welcome clarity on funding and timelines for delivering schemes such as the LRT and the proposed docklands bridges.
• More emphasis in transport objectives to support modal shift towards healthy active and sustainable mobility in the design and delivery of development during the plan period.
• Ensure masterplans and site designs seek to optimise connectivity and ease of access to sustainable and active travel to support low carbon development.
Cork Docklands
•
• Ask for greater flexibility of land use targets within city docklands (Table 10.3) in terms of residential vs non- residential uses, as part of future masterplan for lands at ESB and Bord na Mona sites.
• Ask for City Docks Framework Masterplan to inform an urban design strategy for specific character areas.
• To acknowledge potential role of Urban Development Zones as within ‘Housing for All’. Clarification on majority of docklands as either Tier 2 or Tier 3 lands at ESB and Bord na Mona will be developed during the plan period.
Wilton
•
• Site north of ESB lands is zoned as ZO 01 Sustainable Residential Neighbourhood. The density and height strategy for the site is split between Inner Urban Suburbs and Outer Suburbs. Request entire site is Inner Urban Suburbs. Response and Recommendation to issues located in (Located under relevant chapter in the CE Report):
Volume 1 part 3 under Chapter 2 & 10 and part 4 Land Use Zoning and Mapping
Cork City Submission No.:
Person:
Organisation:
380
O’Callaghan Properties
Summary of Submission and Observation:
• Support for City south docklands development, associated infrastructure and points relating to land zonings, view management framework, car parking standards and publication of supporting documents.
• Rezone O’Calla ghan lands at south docks from ZO 02 to ZO 05 Mixed Use Zoning
• To rezone ZO16 Public Open Space and ZO17 Sports Grounds and Facilities to Mixed Use Development as is surplus to requirements.
• Request change of 15% public open space in south docklands requirement to reduce to 10%. From current plan to draft plan land zoning changes have increased public open space from 24.7% to 40.5% public open space within our landownership. Development capacity has been reduced from current plan to draft plan land zoning changes from mixed use lands to sports grounds and facilities and the proposed increase in width of Kennedy spine.
• Request removal of live ground floor frontage within section 1.47
• Request clarification and revision of View Mgt Framework, lists and mapping so that the lists match the mapping and the maps are clearer as lack clarity – something similar to existing plan Views and Prospects would be preferable.
• Vol.3 View Mgt Framework tables do not entirely correspond with Vol.2 View Mgt Framework Maps
• Clarify what the difference is between ‘Strategic Landmark Buildings’ and ‘Local Landmark Buildings’. Confirm if view and prospect management has been reduced to view protection? Confirm if in Objective 6.14 criteria (e) that it is the buildings and not the views that are to be protected?
175
Powered by FlippingBook